How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?
Thoughts?
Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.
Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?
Kein Mitglied?
Antwort von Stratego!
am 21. Februar 2017 um 16:58
Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.
Antwort von Lockard The GOAT
am 28. Februar 2017 um 00:06
Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.
Antwort von littledevil
am 16. August 2017 um 20:39
three if you see 3.
Antwort von Stratego!
am 16. August 2017 um 21:57
If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.
Antwort von Cujoseph
am 27. Dezember 2017 um 14:50
Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.
Antwort von Stratego!
am 27. Dezember 2017 um 15:30
Quote please.
Antwort von Cujoseph
am 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:08
It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"
Antwort von littledevil
am 27. Dezember 2017 um 22:38
I dig it.
Antwort von Stratego!
am 27. Dezember 2017 um 23:20
Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...
Antwort von Cujoseph
am 27. Dezember 2017 um 23:44
Wehoaks knows it to be true.