How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?
Thoughts?
Kan du ikke finde en film eller TV-serie? Log in og opret den.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Ikke medlem?
Svar af Stratego!
d. 21 februar 2017 kl. 4:58 PM
Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.
Svar af Lockard The GOAT
d. 28 februar 2017 kl. 12:06 AM
Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.
Svar af littledevil
d. 16 august 2017 kl. 8:39 PM
three if you see 3.
Svar af Stratego!
d. 16 august 2017 kl. 9:57 PM
If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.
Svar af Cujoseph
d. 27 december 2017 kl. 2:50 PM
Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.
Svar af Stratego!
d. 27 december 2017 kl. 3:30 PM
Quote please.
Svar af Cujoseph
d. 27 december 2017 kl. 4:08 PM
It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"
Svar af littledevil
d. 27 december 2017 kl. 10:38 PM
I dig it.
Svar af Stratego!
d. 27 december 2017 kl. 11:20 PM
Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...
Svar af Cujoseph
d. 27 december 2017 kl. 11:44 PM
Wehoaks knows it to be true.