How was that pulled off so swiftly without Casey seeing anything? Actually, I think she must have seen something because she squirms away for a second before turning on the patio light, but did Stu just run across and slit his guts open and then hide somewhere else, or did it happen another way?
Thoughts?
لم تجد الفلم أو المسلسل ؟ سجل دخولك و انشئها
هل تريد تقييم او اضافة هذا العنصر للقائمة؟
لست عضو؟
رد بواسطة Stratego!
بتاريخ فبراير 21, 2017 في 4:58 مساءا
Maybe she did see a dark figure running by, the camera just doesn't show us. But it IS more difficult, ofcourse, to see what's happening outside at night when the lights are on inside. I think Stu was probably hiding on one side of the patio, ran across and slit Steve's guts and then hid on the other side.
رد بواسطة Lockard The GOAT
بتاريخ فبراير 28, 2017 في 12:06 صباحا
Movie logic. Same as getting us to believe that one person was responsible for the entire thing until it was revealed there were two killers at the end.
رد بواسطة littledevil
بتاريخ أغسطس 16, 2017 في 8:39 مساءا
three if you see 3.
رد بواسطة Stratego!
بتاريخ أغسطس 16, 2017 في 9:57 مساءا
If you're talking about Roman. He was not involved in any of the murders in the first movie. As he said himself, Billy and Stu decided to make a movie of their own.
رد بواسطة Cujoseph
بتاريخ ديسمبر 27, 2017 في 2:50 مساءا
Roman specifically states that he was the one who killed the principal.
رد بواسطة Stratego!
بتاريخ ديسمبر 27, 2017 في 3:30 مساءا
Quote please.
رد بواسطة Cujoseph
بتاريخ ديسمبر 27, 2017 في 4:08 مساءا
It's been awhile but I believe it went something like " I Roman killed the school principal in Scream 1. Do ya'll dig?"
رد بواسطة littledevil
بتاريخ ديسمبر 27, 2017 في 10:38 مساءا
I dig it.
رد بواسطة Stratego!
بتاريخ ديسمبر 27, 2017 في 11:20 مساءا
Must be from the non-crappy Scream 3 version that only exists in your and Guy's heads...
رد بواسطة Cujoseph
بتاريخ ديسمبر 27, 2017 في 11:44 مساءا
Wehoaks knows it to be true.