Discuter de Le Procès du siècle
Discuter → Films → Le Procès du siècle → Générales
Official narrative is denial
posté par theunbeholdenSTAFFMOD le 11 mars 2017 à 23h55
I never see any specific examples of "nazi records" and "allied intelligence" about the holocaust. Those "death camp guards" were tortured for confessions the British even admitted to it.
1.Baron Paget of Northampton wrote in his book titled “Manstein: His Campaign and His Trial” (published by Collins in 1951) on page 109:
[The US Simpson Inquiry Commission] reported among other things that of the 139 cases they had investigated, 137 had had their testicles permanently destroyed by kicks received from the American War Crimes Investigating Team.
- Pennsylvania judge Edward L. Van Roden – member of the commission investigating the accusations by Colonel Everett who reported that Germans did not receive fair trial, wrote in his book titled “American Atrocities in Germany“:
Our investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him, and beat him with rubber hose. Many of the German defendants had teeth knocked out. Some had their jaws broken. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair.
- In 1983, author Rupert Butler, notable for his other books namely Hand of Steel, The Black Angels and Gestapo (published by Hamlyn) wrote an anti-Nazi book entitled Legions of Death. At the beginning of Legions of Death, Rupert Butler expresses his gratitude to two persons, one of whom being British officer of Jewish origin by the name of Bernard Clarke. Bernard Clarke is notable for being the person who captured Rudolf Höss. Because Legions of Death an anti-Nazi book, Rupert Butler did not try to take a critical stance against Bernard Clarke who expressed pride in having tortured a Nazi. Little did the two know that by doing that, they would ultimately confirm what everybody knew all along, but nobody had first-hand account of – that Rudolf Höss’ testimony was extracted by torture, that the job of the interrogators was to secure German guilt before the Nuremberg trials, that all those false and self-incriminating statements German POWs signed had been presented to them by their captors in finished form, only after they were broken down with the use of thorough psychological and physical torture.
this is why the truth is illegal to talk about in the majority of the "free world".
Réponse de potus_af1
le 20 mars 2017 à 04h10
I watched some talks given by David Ir. After she won the court case, she gave a talk in Israel. she said they managed to de-stabilize him before the trial. he explained following what did she mean. His daughter passed away just a week before the trial. after the funeral, while he was mourning in his house, he received a gift (a flower?) from someone. it was dedicated by a dead German. his mind was blank and could not concentrate on the self-defend trial.
David point on WW2 is, WW2 is a disaster for all sides. Allies did bad mass killing too. Chinese death toll is 7M (civilians alone due to war), total causalities at least 15M, No special word was created for the atrocity. only Haloc~ was created by Jews and they cling on this as if they are the ONLY victim in this war. they use their media power, book distribution power, entertainment industry power, and political power to whitewash their own crime in WW2.
this is not to say that all jews are bad. but a few of them have great power of the wealth and do whatever they want. This movie included.
Réponse de tmdb87389679
le 20 janvier 2018 à 14h16
I completely agree with both of you.