This thread is completely confusing. OPs poster is full neuter. Replacement has full text even if correct aspect ratio. Regardless 800x1200 and ESP. bad AR and bizarre sizes should only ever be downvoted. With modern popular movies that have plenty of HUGE preferred posters up/down voting is obvious? https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/qGgadYKeL2JIQhRVA0A7kp28kS0.jpg
edit: Still crippled with poor internet and did not check the bible, but upload dialog is helpful and personally have a list of every standard resize between 500x750 and 2000x3000 and always lean to 1000x1500 or better. Just my opinion.
So what was that, the mod whose id changes almost daily that hates me deletes a standard and larger size image because I uploaded it in preference to a smaller rando sized 758x1137? And completely ignores what six with bad AR including this horrible one: https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/rUNEPZJG8s3qMDo9peIUJQD1DLp.jpg
Why exactly is he or she depending on day still a mod? Guess it is my lucky day that TB fixed it or I would be banned right now?
edit: Let me guess EJ has a new alias and I hurt his feelings?
So what was that, the mod whose id changes almost daily that hates me deletes a standard and larger size image because I uploaded it in preference to a smaller rando sized 758x1137?
I doubt the responsible mod is going to answer here, but my guess is that your image was ever so slightly upscaled (or not downscaled enough if the source was a larger image). Perhaps it would look great at 1000x1500 or something in that ballpark.
ticao2 🇧🇷 pt-BR 的回复
于 2018 年 10 月 17 日 2:30下午
The position of the posters is modified according to the vote (likes).
You can vote for what you prefer. Only one vote per user will be valid.
And besides, I could not vote for what you like because I do not know what it is.
You need to identify better. What's your favorite?
https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/i91mfvFcPPlaegcbOyjGgiWfZzh.jpg
https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/2MrNHzN4q9fB5OHlbv3HrzujnUx.jpg
JulianJordan 的回复
于 2018 年 10 月 17 日 2:36下午
https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/1yaYSXeecZU2p5bPUOEaGxMCPVy.jpg
ticao2 🇧🇷 pt-BR 的回复
于 2018 年 10 月 17 日 3:11下午
The poster you added is out of the recommended proportion. (1x1.5)
I made an adjustment.
https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/9NDSJ8bu7XHfhAzaW2iYsRnFTtQ.jpg
I'll delete yours.
And I voted for what you indicated.
DaMaN 的回复
于 2018 年 11 月 21 日 3:19上午
This thread is completely confusing. OPs poster is full neuter. Replacement has full text even if correct aspect ratio. Regardless 800x1200 and ESP. bad AR and bizarre sizes should only ever be downvoted. With modern popular movies that have plenty of HUGE preferred posters up/down voting is obvious? https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/qGgadYKeL2JIQhRVA0A7kp28kS0.jpg
edit: Still crippled with poor internet and did not check the bible, but upload dialog is helpful and personally have a list of every standard resize between 500x750 and 2000x3000 and always lean to 1000x1500 or better. Just my opinion.
DaMaN 的回复
于 2018 年 11 月 21 日 8:13上午
So what was that, the mod whose id changes almost daily that hates me deletes a standard and larger size image because I uploaded it in preference to a smaller rando sized 758x1137? And completely ignores what six with bad AR including this horrible one: https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/original/rUNEPZJG8s3qMDo9peIUJQD1DLp.jpg
Why exactly is he or she depending on day still a mod? Guess it is my lucky day that TB fixed it or I would be banned right now?
edit: Let me guess EJ has a new alias and I hurt his feelings?
lineker 的回复
于 2018 年 11 月 22 日 5:28上午
I doubt the responsible mod is going to answer here, but my guess is that your image was ever so slightly upscaled (or not downscaled enough if the source was a larger image). Perhaps it would look great at 1000x1500 or something in that ballpark.