At the time, it wasn't officially called BATMAN RETURNS but BATMAN II and it was presumably a more direct sequel to the 1989 movie. But Tim Burton didn't like Hamm's draft so he brought in Daniel Waters (and later Wesley Strick for rewrites) to handle the screenplay: http://www.batman-online.com/forum/index.php?topic=2205.msg33685#msg33685
http://www.batman-online.com/forum/index.php?topic=2205.msg33689#msg33689
فیلم و نمایش تلویزیونی را نمیتوانید پیدا کنید؟ به سیستم وارد شوید تا آن را ایجاد کنید.
آیا میخواهید به این مورد امتیاز دهید یا به فهرست اضافه کنید؟
عضو نیستید؟
پاسخ توسط Mrs.peacock
در تاریخ نوامبر 27, 2018 ساعت 1:11 ق.ض
Having read all three screenplays my personal feeling is that it's almost a shame that Burton didn't direct Sam Hamm's script, which is more of a straight sequel to the original film and features a more coherent, albeit arguably more cartoonish (i.e. buried treasure), plot. Despite the campiness of the buried treasure plotline and this version of the Penguin with his bird-motif related crimes (despite being a released convict Mr Bodiface is a distinguished ornithologist who trains birds to attack his enemies in occasionally unpleasant ways) there is some intelligent and dark commentary going on, particularly in relation to Bruce's wealthy blue-blooded peers and their rapacious form of capitalism, and although not quite as realistic as Nolan's movies, the script is less of an absurd (and I don't necessarily use that word in a pejorative sense) fantasy/fairytale but a rather more credible thriller/film-noir. Moreover, Catwoman and the Penguin are much closer to their comic-book counterparts (in the sense that Catwoman is a thief) except in the respect that this Catwoman is an entirely unsympathetic villain as opposed to the anti-heroine of the comic-books and the Burton and Nolan movies.