Discuter de The Belko Experiment

This movie totally kept me guessing until the very end. The people I thought would die didn't. I like how the writer made the rules, up the ante and then modified them. I liked guessing which people would die and how it would happen. I liked seeing the characters react to their predicament.

7 réponses (sur la page 1 sur 1)

Jump to last post

I liked it and agree it needs a sequel.

Not sure where they'd go with a sequel, I like the ending showing MORE experiments going on simultanously...I like the endings that make your mind imagine away without going into full details. This is good enough as is (stand alone flick), but wouldn't be angry over a sequel either.

The ending actually showed that there was one survivor from each of the many MORE experiments going on simultaneously. All /any one of those survivors is a place to go with a sequel. Unnecessary sequels are made from movies with a lesser premise all the time.

I enjoyed everything except the way it ended when the purpose of the experiment was finally revealed. I thought the ending jumped the shark. I don't think the movie deserves a sequel either. I'm getting very tired of sequels anyway.

It was pretty intense. Greg Mclean's best since Wolf Creek. But then that's not really saying much.

@ScorpionQ2 said:

The ending actually showed that there was one survivor from each of the many MORE experiments going on simultaneously. All /any one of those survivors is a place to go with a sequel. Unnecessary sequels are made from movies with a lesser premise all the time.

I liked it well enough for what it was, but I don't see a need for a sequel. What more can they do or say that wasn't already done and said? It would be a money-grab retread like Human Centipede 2 or Beyond the Poseidon Adventure. The original story was self-contained (and extraordinarily derivative). That said, they clearly left it open for a sequel when the voice-over intoned "End of Phase 1. Prepare for Phase 2." I guess the lone survivor of each "experiment" will be pitted against one another. Been there, seen that.

@Dedoc1967 said:

I guess the lone survivor of each "experiment" will be pitted against one another. Been there, seen that.

That may apply to you- but realize everyone does not have the cup or the hat.

Like I previously stated- unnecessary sequels are made from movies with a lesser premise all the time.

Movies that don't need a sequel very often not only get a sequel, (and sometimes even the dreaded prequel ) but a part 3, 4, 5, 6 , and so on . So it's not about need, what it boils down to is there some producer somewhere who will take on the task.

If one is made from The Belco Experiment, then it's simple - anyone who doesn't want to see it doesn't have to.

Un film, une émission télévisée ou un artiste est introuvable ? Connectez-vous afin de créer une nouvelle fiche.

Général

s Mettre le curseur dans la barre de recherche
p Ouvrir le menu du profil
esc Fermer une fenêtre ouverte
? Ouvrir la fenêtre des raccourcis clavier

Sur les pages des médias

b Retour (ou vers le parent si faisable)
e Afficher la page de modification

Sur les pages des saisons des émissions télévisées

Afficher la saison suivante (flèche droite)
Afficher la saison précédente (flèche gauche)

Sur les pages des épisodes des émissions télévisées

Afficher l'épisode suivant (flèche droite)
Afficher l'épisode précédent (flèche gauche)

Sur toutes les pages des images / photos

a Ouvrir la fenêtre d'ajout d'image / photo

Sur toutes les pages de modifications

t Ouvrir le sélecteur de traduction
ctrl+ s Envoyer le formulaire

Sur les pages des discussions

n Créer une nouvelle discussion
w Basculer le statut de suivi
p Basculer publique / privée
c Basculer fermer / ouvrir
a Ouvrir l'activité
r Répondre à la discussion
l Afficher la dernière réponse
ctrl+ enter Envoyer votre message
Page suivante (flèche droite)
Page précédente (flèche gauche)

Paramètres

Vous souhaitez évaluer ou ajouter cet élément à une liste ?

Connexion