i don't know why they did not just have amy play both parts. this film was impressive to look at (particularly jake naked) but it was candyfloss in comparison to a single man.
i don't know why they did not just have amy play both parts. this film was impressive to look at (particularly jake naked) but it was candyfloss in comparison to a single man.
Yes, that was just weird. I'd have thought it would have made a lot more sense to be JG and AA playing both roles OR totally different actors for all the roles in the book. There is no explanation of why Susan chose to visualise JG in the book, but not herself, given that it is established that JG never had another wife.
MrsBuckyBarnesからの返信
投稿:2017年02月20日 4:52 PM
the casting was very odd in this film. laura linney is too young to play amy adam's mum.
lindewellからの返信
投稿:2017年02月21日 1:02 PM
What are you talking about? Isla Fischer isn't her daughter, she's impersonating Susan in the book, that's why they look the same age.
SpeechIsntFreeからの返信
投稿:2017年02月25日 8:41 AM
I know when I first viewed, "Wedding Crashers", I was absolutely certain I was watching Amy Adams.
Of course, that was until I actually saw the closing credits rolling on my screen.
MrsBuckyBarnesからの返信
投稿:2017年02月26日 5:33 PM
i don't know why they did not just have amy play both parts. this film was impressive to look at (particularly jake naked) but it was candyfloss in comparison to a single man.
Fergooseからの返信
投稿:2020年10月16日 11:42 AM
Yes, that was just weird. I'd have thought it would have made a lot more sense to be JG and AA playing both roles OR totally different actors for all the roles in the book. There is no explanation of why Susan chose to visualise JG in the book, but not herself, given that it is established that JG never had another wife.