i don't know why they did not just have amy play both parts. this film was impressive to look at (particularly jake naked) but it was candyfloss in comparison to a single man.
i don't know why they did not just have amy play both parts. this film was impressive to look at (particularly jake naked) but it was candyfloss in comparison to a single man.
Yes, that was just weird. I'd have thought it would have made a lot more sense to be JG and AA playing both roles OR totally different actors for all the roles in the book. There is no explanation of why Susan chose to visualise JG in the book, but not herself, given that it is established that JG never had another wife.
رد بواسطة MrsBuckyBarnes
بتاريخ فبراير 20, 2017 في 4:52 مساءا
the casting was very odd in this film. laura linney is too young to play amy adam's mum.
رد بواسطة lindewell
بتاريخ فبراير 21, 2017 في 1:02 مساءا
What are you talking about? Isla Fischer isn't her daughter, she's impersonating Susan in the book, that's why they look the same age.
رد بواسطة SpeechIsntFree
بتاريخ فبراير 25, 2017 في 8:41 صباحا
I know when I first viewed, "Wedding Crashers", I was absolutely certain I was watching Amy Adams.
Of course, that was until I actually saw the closing credits rolling on my screen.
رد بواسطة MrsBuckyBarnes
بتاريخ فبراير 26, 2017 في 5:33 مساءا
i don't know why they did not just have amy play both parts. this film was impressive to look at (particularly jake naked) but it was candyfloss in comparison to a single man.
رد بواسطة Fergoose
بتاريخ أكتوبر 16, 2020 في 11:42 صباحا
Yes, that was just weird. I'd have thought it would have made a lot more sense to be JG and AA playing both roles OR totally different actors for all the roles in the book. There is no explanation of why Susan chose to visualise JG in the book, but not herself, given that it is established that JG never had another wife.