Discusión A Star Is Born
Discutir → Películas → A Star Is Born → General
Is there any other reason to see this movie other than Lady Googoo.
publicado por Nygma-0999STAFFMOD el 16 de octubre de 2018 a las 16:41
Because Honestly, Im not a fan.
Contestado por rudely_murray
el 16 de octubre de 2018 a las 19:40
I'll watch this but the idea doesn't excite me at all. Does the world really need yet another version of this story?
Contestado por Purplehearts
el 17 de octubre de 2018 a las 11:05
I don't think that I have seen any versions of this movie. Which versions have you seen and which one did you like the most?
Contestado por rudely_murray
el 17 de octubre de 2018 a las 20:28
I've seen the 1937 Janet Gaynor/Fredric March version, which is quite good, and the 1954 Judy Garland/James Mason version, which is generally considered the definitive version of the story. It is certainly the superior of the two, and both Garland and (especially) Mason are superb. Some of the music numbers do drag on a bit but it mostly earns its classic status.
I have never seen the 1976 Streisand/Kristofferson film, which by most accounts is not very good.
Contestado por spreerod1538
el 19 de octubre de 2018 a las 11:59
Bradley Cooper was really awesome in this. That's the reason to see this.
Contestado por DaMaN
el 15 de noviembre de 2018 a las 19:45
Heard Cooper insisted she hold all the GAGa nonsense. And she HAS to do better than BS!?!
Contestado por SueDNim
el 21 de enero de 2019 a las 22:42
OMG. They remade this with Lady Gaga? LADY GAGA in Judy Garland's role?! That tears it. Somebody just shoot me now.
Contestado por Stand*Chickie
el 13 de marzo de 2019 a las 15:38
Was Lady GaGa really nude in that bathtub scene at the Chateau Marmont? You only saw her for a split second when she stood up and Jackson stormed out closing the door.