Nothing to see here really. Just a very generic and mundane by the numbers thriller you've seen dozens or hundreds of times already, and it isn't all that well made anyways.
I should mention, though, that you will probably see the wildest deductions you've ever seen in a movie in this film. For example, they find one victim in a freezer, and notice that he is more frozen than the surrounding meat. One of them has a bright idea that he was wet when he was put in the freezer because he likes to wrap his beer can's in a wet towel to make them get colder faster. So they deduce that the killer obviously wants them to look in a river for the next clue. I mean no mention which river obviously. The next scene is the police dragging out a car out of the river, which obviously contains the next clue.
Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.
Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?
Kein Mitglied?
Antwort von cpheonix
am 6. März 2018 um 18:04
Yeah that deduction was pretty convoluted. Overall a pretty poor thriller, and both leads looked awful.
Al Pacino really seemed disinterested and it was like he was delivering his lines almost as if he was reading them from a card off screen.