Keskustele nimikkeestä Spider-Man: Homecoming
Keskustele → Elokuvat → Spider-Man: Homecoming → Yleinen
Very Stupid because there was No Lead up of how he became Spiderman and how he met Tony Starks
Kirjoittanut melaniSTAFFMOD pvä 4 heinäkuu 2019 klo 6:58AM
In all the other Spiderman movies they always show the whole story and not just the middle , and end.
Vastaus käyttäjältä Philippe LeMarchand
4 heinäkuu 2019 klo 8:29AM
I thought it was refreshing that the audience were assumed to know the origin story rather than have to sit through it again. As for Stark, most of the audience knew what was going on there too.
Vastaus käyttäjältä autoexec.batman
5 heinäkuu 2019 klo 5:57PM
So you think they should have made the 3rd Spider-Man origin film in 15 years really? So, every 5 years, retell Spider-Man's origin?
Vastaus käyttäjältä Cuzonair
7 joulukuu 2020 klo 4:45PM
FUKK you broke WHITE BOY
Vastaus käyttäjältä jorgito2001
7 joulukuu 2020 klo 5:15PM
Personally, they already did it TWICE...sitting through it a 2nd time (Amazing Spider-Man) was downright BORING to me! I usually don't defend the MCU much, but will in this case...I'm glad they skipped the whole origin AGAIN.
Kevin Feige has such a hard-0n for Iron Man/RDJ they might link the radioactive spider to Stark Industries somehow...thanks but no thanks!
Vastaus käyttäjältä Dark_Sithlord
8 joulukuu 2020 klo 3:29AM
If they were to do Spider-Man's origin story again, then they have to do it right. They screwed it up in Amazing Spider-Man. It was downright ludicrous with the grocery store robber. Raimi's version was close, but they changed a few things around so there was the emotional angst of having Uncle Ben die in Peter's arms. So, I'd rather they skip the origin than risk another failed attempt at it.