It was all done by the actors. Lillian Gish said she was terrified, and her co-star actually had to jump repeatedly from one floating ice chunk to another to get to her; then he picked her up and carried her to safety. Simply incredible.
And the temperature was so cold that they had to light a fire under the camera to keep it warm enough to operate. The cast and crew certainly earned their pay in that scene.
Un film, une émission télévisée ou un artiste est introuvable ? Connectez-vous afin de créer une nouvelle fiche.
Vous souhaitez évaluer ou ajouter cet élément à une liste ?
Pas encore membre ?
Réponse de genplant29
le 10 novembre 2019 à 01h15
Impressive, indeed. I suspect that nowadays such a scene would be enacted and filmed in a studio water tank. Surrounding environment, plus various "danger" and freezing temperatures special effects, would be CGI'd in after the fact.
This interesting TCM.com article tells more about the Silent classic's ice floe filming.
Réponse de martymonstertmdb
le 10 novembre 2019 à 13h53
It is amazing the risks sometimes taken in older films, but controlling the environment, film trickery and stunt doubles is hardly a new thing. Only a couple of years later they used every trick in the book available to them to film Harold Lloyd's famous clock stunt.
Does real danger really make it better? I mean in a similar scene to Safety Last Christopher Lloyd is probably 2 ft off the ground when he's hanging from the clock tower in Back to the Future, but the scene doesn't suffer for it.
Réponse de Zürich Gnome
le 15 novembre 2019 à 21h24
Yes, and the reason they did that two years later is probably because people in the industry complained about how dangerous the filming of Way Down East had been. The industry was forced to get its act together fast, to avoid all sorts of insurance/lawsuit issues.
Nobody is arguing whether it makes it better or not (whatever you mean by "better"). It's a statement about how dangerous early filming was, irrespective of the effect on the audience. But I would also argue, as many have recently indicated, that audiences are starting to get a bit jaded, knowing that so much is now done by CGI, making it less impressive. Some have bemoaned the fact that things are now often assumed to be done by CGI, even when they actually aren't.
Réponse de WantinShoulder
le 15 novembre 2019 à 22h15
Incredible. Gish was said to have her hair frozen and adhered onto an ice slab gushing down river. No wonder why she was terrified.
Lloyd and Keaton also did perform dangerous stunts. Keaton and the waterfall scene where he has to rescue the beautiful damsel floating over the top.
Silent version of Uncle Tom's Cabin also has cast members jumping across gushing river from one ice slab to the next.
Silent version of Noah's Ark has some extras but real humans succumbing to dangerous gushing flood waters.
Réponse de genplant29
le 15 novembre 2019 à 22h42
Regarding Noah's Ark (1928), from Wikipedia:
That movies' epic flooding portion is spectacular. (The movie otherwise? Not so great.)
Réponse de WantinShoulder
le 15 novembre 2019 à 22h58
Wow. That is really phenomenal.
Réponse de genplant29
le 15 novembre 2019 à 23h47
There's so much about the Silent era, particularly the 1920s decade thereof, that is absolutely remarkable the truly daring and dangerous stunts people were performing (for example the dazzling chariots race - that a real-life terrible smash-up occurred during - in 1925's Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, and the intense conflagration - that at least three extras were badly burned in - in 1929's The Godless Girl), and the techniques that were being thought up for how to be able to successfully film them. When Way Down East was released in 1920, the Gish ice floe scenes (click on picture to enlarge) were unlike anything that had been seen on screen before.
Réponse de martymonstertmdb
le 16 novembre 2019 à 09h28
The picture is amazing. Thanks for posting.
Réponse de WantinShoulder
le 16 novembre 2019 à 22h11
Yes. That picture is amazing.