Some will call it a masterpiece and a piece of art while others will call it utter trash. Personally I lean way more to the latter option, and I found it utterly boring and nonsensical and it seemed like it was trying really hard to deliver a profound message that it ultimately never manages to deliver.
Un film, une émission télévisée ou un artiste est introuvable ? Connectez-vous afin de créer une nouvelle fiche.
Vous souhaitez évaluer ou ajouter cet élément à une liste ?
Pas encore membre ?
Réponse de rufusoffan
le 12 avril 2019 à 14h36
I totally agree. I currently find myself in the latter category, except that I found it too entertaining in and of itself to call it trash. I've put it in my "aimed high and missed" bucket, right next to Ang Lee's Hulk film. I'm planning to reread the book before it gets to streaming, as I suspected as I watched that I was missing quite a few things. I may then be able to put it in the former category - Gilliam hasn't disappointed me yet.
Réponse de Benedict
le 25 février 2020 à 22h13
Also in the latter category. I found it quite intolerable. The comedy was rarely amusing and mostly annoying, while the performances are such caricatures they began to grate within minutes.
Réponse de rominabe
le 16 juin 2021 à 23h43
I liked it, but less than other films from Gilliam. Has a few good moments ...Is a pretty strange film, no doubt