After I deleted the image I noticed that you had changed the movie to adult:true. If that setting is correct, the poster can be explicit. At this point it is unclear exactly how much hardcore pornography it will feature, but my guess is it will still be an adult:true entry when all is said and done. With the current setting it is fine to add the poster again.
(EDIT: Just to keep it simple, I changed the adult status back to false. When we know about the explicit content, we can have another discussion about that. If it is similar to Nymphomaniac it should be fine, but that will be a later discussion. With this setting the explicit poster is not OK to add. Thanks.)
What warrants as hardcore pornography and what as art? The movie features penetration (though never really a close up on a vagina), erect penises, penetration seen from inside the vagina, a visit to a swinger club (sort of like in irreversible but more action shots), ejaculation in 3D towards the viewer, etc. It's shot classy though and features a story but hey, porn has that too (sometimes)-
I saw that 9 Songs isn't adult either but also features a blowjob and ejaculation. Nymphomaniac also had BJs and penetration (though CG apparently)..?
If any of the above flags for adult it's best to change it back. It probably won't run in the cinema in the US but it is shown at festivals and in France at the moment.
I saw that 9 Songs isn't adult either but also features a blowjob and ejaculation. Nymphomaniac also had BJs and penetration (though CG apparently)..?
Nymphomaniac had porn actors lower bodies attached to the real actors by special effects (if I remember correctly).
There are also movies such as The Pornographer and The Idiots where just a few seconds of hardcore content clearly won't make those movies hardcore porn. On the other hand we have kept the adult setting for some 1970s movies with two or more hardcore scenes. However, since we did allow Nymphomaniac, at least at this stage I would vote to keep Love as a regular movie while still being open for other opinions and more discussion.
To some extent the fact that the directors for a few of the titles mentioned here are Michael Winterbottom, Lars von Trier and Gaspar Noé is crucial to why they are seen in a different light.
Reply by lineker
on May 2, 2015 at 5:25 AM
After I deleted the image I noticed that you had changed the movie to adult:true. If that setting is correct, the poster can be explicit. At this point it is unclear exactly how much hardcore pornography it will feature, but my guess is it will still be an adult:true entry when all is said and done. With the current setting it is fine to add the poster again.
(EDIT: Just to keep it simple, I changed the adult status back to false. When we know about the explicit content, we can have another discussion about that. If it is similar to Nymphomaniac it should be fine, but that will be a later discussion. With this setting the explicit poster is not OK to add. Thanks.)
Reply by sp1ti
on July 19, 2015 at 10:08 AM
What warrants as hardcore pornography and what as art? The movie features penetration (though never really a close up on a vagina), erect penises, penetration seen from inside the vagina, a visit to a swinger club (sort of like in irreversible but more action shots), ejaculation in 3D towards the viewer, etc. It's shot classy though and features a story but hey, porn has that too (sometimes)-
I saw that 9 Songs isn't adult either but also features a blowjob and ejaculation. Nymphomaniac also had BJs and penetration (though CG apparently)..?
If any of the above flags for adult it's best to change it back. It probably won't run in the cinema in the US but it is shown at festivals and in France at the moment.
Reply by lineker
on July 19, 2015 at 11:19 AM
Nymphomaniac had porn actors lower bodies attached to the real actors by special effects (if I remember correctly).
There are also movies such as The Pornographer and The Idiots where just a few seconds of hardcore content clearly won't make those movies hardcore porn. On the other hand we have kept the adult setting for some 1970s movies with two or more hardcore scenes. However, since we did allow Nymphomaniac, at least at this stage I would vote to keep Love as a regular movie while still being open for other opinions and more discussion.
To some extent the fact that the directors for a few of the titles mentioned here are Michael Winterbottom, Lars von Trier and Gaspar Noé is crucial to why they are seen in a different light.
Reply by sp1ti
on July 19, 2015 at 11:29 AM
Ok, then it seems right to keep it regular and abstain from uploading that one poster ;)!
Reply by lineker
on July 19, 2015 at 11:40 AM
Yes! :)