The opening subtitles (in English) are incredibly incoherent. Speaking of a fictitious election, a presumably fictitious and unspecified bill S-18 then another bill S-14 where a parent can decide to have an unruly child with behavioural issues hospitalised, "without due process of law".
Is this S-14 fictitious? If not, was it ever a policy of a party contesting an election.
Or was the film purely about a completely hypothetical situation? I suspect the latter and that there was a typo in the opening scenes of make S-18 and S-14 sound like different bills?
Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.
Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?
Kein Mitglied?
Antwort von Fergoose
am 12. Januar 2022 um 12:57
Thanks for the clarification. I guess my point would be if there are elements of society or laws that would inspire the director, why not just base it around one of them. Just seems a hit strange for a non-sci fi film to be based around a fictitious law that hasn't ever really been proposed.