Über Mommy diskutieren

The opening subtitles (in English) are incredibly incoherent. Speaking of a fictitious election, a presumably fictitious and unspecified bill S-18 then another bill S-14 where a parent can decide to have an unruly child with behavioural issues hospitalised, "without due process of law".

Is this S-14 fictitious? If not, was it ever a policy of a party contesting an election.

Or was the film purely about a completely hypothetical situation? I suspect the latter and that there was a typo in the opening scenes of make S-18 and S-14 sound like different bills?

1 Antwort (Seite 1 von 1)

Jump to last post

@SvenskMan said:

The plot is "In a fictional outcome for the 2015 Canadian federal election, a political party comes to power and establishes a law called S-14, allowing parents of troubled children and limited finances to place their children in hospitals, without regard for fundamental justice". So, Yes S-14 is fictitious. But I can think of many things that have inspred Xavier Dolan.

Thanks for the clarification. I guess my point would be if there are elements of society or laws that would inspire the director, why not just base it around one of them. Just seems a hit strange for a non-sci fi film to be based around a fictitious law that hasn't ever really been proposed.

Es fehlt ein Film oder eine Serie? Logge dich ein zum Ergänzen.

Allgemein

s Fokus auf Suchfeld
p Profil öffnen
esc Fenster schließen
? Tastenkürzel anzeigen

Videos

b Zurück
e Bearbeiten

Staffeln

Nächste Staffel
Vorherige Staffel

Episoden

Nächste Episode
Vorherige Episode

Bilder

a Poster oder Hintergrundbild hinzufügen

Editieren

t Sprachauswahl öffnen
ctrl+ s Speichern

Diskussionen

n Neue Diskussion erstellen
w Beobachten an / aus
p Diskussion öffentlich / privat
c Diskussion öffnen / schließen
a Diskussionsverlauf anzeigen
r Auf Diskussion antworten
l Letzte Antwort anzeigen
ctrl+ enter Senden
Nächste Seite
Vorherige Seite

Einstellungen

Diesen Eintrag bewerten oder zu einer Liste hinzufügen?

Anmelden