Debate Back to the Future Part III
Discutir → Películas → Back to the Future Part III → General
No 1955 Enchantment Under Sea?
publicado por Glenn MedeirosSTAFFMOD el 6 de enero de 2018 a las 18:22
Nothing's gonna change my love for this film but still I is gonna ask this - how come no 1955 finale this time?
Ok you'sa got the Wild West and that's cool but think how funny to see not two but THREE sets of Mr Doc and Marti running about in 1954, trying no to bump into each other - it's gonna be hilarious no?
Contestado por tmdb43737777
el 8 de octubre de 2018 a las 01:37
It would he retread and it wouldn't fit in this movie. The only reason they had to go back at all was for the sports almanac. What other reason would they have for going back?
Contestado por Glenn Medeiros
el 13 de octubre de 2018 a las 09:54
I sorry, I no know the reason
I just thinking it would be real funny to see THREE sets of Mr Doc and Marti and the three times Mr Doc and Marti can no allow BOTH number ones and twos to see them or it all go loco 
Contestado por jorgito2001
el 15 de octubre de 2018 a las 16:25
If you wanna see 3 sets of the same character in the same timeline, I strongly recommend you watch Time Crimes aka Los Cronocrimines! Very good film.
As for BTTF3, I agree with most here, another Enchatment Under The Sea Dance scene would've been overkill.