Ouch. Well we can only hope, as with all propaganda films, that history won’t remember it kindly. Probably not though. People still adore Zero Dark Thirty even though it’s just a paper thinly veiled rally cry to justify the CIA’s torture of war prisoners (which ironically in the film, as well as reality, didn’t even yield any useful information). My guess is there’s always a violent fringe audience who wants to see dumbed-down “good guy vs bad guy” war flicks where their side is the good guy. And directors like Eastwood are only too ready to sell it. I lost all respect for the guy when he endorsed Trump. But at least he’s kinda shut his mouth about politics ever since his team trashed the Capitol building. I just hope he isn’t working on a film about those “patriots”.
My guess is there’s always a violent fringe audience who wants to see dumbed-down “good guy vs bad guy” war flicks where their side is the good guy. And directors like Eastwood are only too ready to sell it.
Yep. This movie paid a handsome $9.22 of revenue for each production budget dollar.
I lost all respect for the guy when he endorsed Trump. But at least he’s kinda shut his mouth about politics ever since his team trashed the Capitol building. I just hope he isn’t working on a film about those “patriots”.
We can only hope.
One of the points from these critiques that carries a lot of weight for me is the contention that producers of these movies are not even honest with the available information. So determined are they to tell/sell their fabrication to their base, facts be damned - instead of adding constructively to public discourse, they seem to prefer to cash in while fomenting and fanning flames of division.
I'd say "shame on him" but this mindset seems incapable of shame.
Reply by bratface
on September 27, 2022 at 7:25 PM
I have always espoused the phrase, 'One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter'.
I haven't read the article yet, I'll read it later tonight or tomorrow.
Reply by rooprect
on September 27, 2022 at 7:41 PM
Answer: director = Clint Eastwood what do I win???
Reply by DRDMovieMusings
on September 29, 2022 at 12:35 PM
Here's an even more scathing review - Every movie rewrites history. What American Sniper did is much, much worse.
Reply by rooprect
on September 29, 2022 at 3:03 PM
Ouch. Well we can only hope, as with all propaganda films, that history won’t remember it kindly. Probably not though. People still adore Zero Dark Thirty even though it’s just a paper thinly veiled rally cry to justify the CIA’s torture of war prisoners (which ironically in the film, as well as reality, didn’t even yield any useful information). My guess is there’s always a violent fringe audience who wants to see dumbed-down “good guy vs bad guy” war flicks where their side is the good guy. And directors like Eastwood are only too ready to sell it. I lost all respect for the guy when he endorsed Trump. But at least he’s kinda shut his mouth about politics ever since his team trashed the Capitol building. I just hope he isn’t working on a film about those “patriots”.
Reply by DRDMovieMusings
on September 29, 2022 at 3:19 PM
Yep. This movie paid a handsome $9.22 of revenue for each production budget dollar.
We can only hope.
One of the points from these critiques that carries a lot of weight for me is the contention that producers of these movies are not even honest with the available information. So determined are they to tell/sell their fabrication to their base, facts be damned - instead of adding constructively to public discourse, they seem to prefer to cash in while fomenting and fanning flames of division.
I'd say "shame on him" but this mindset seems incapable of shame.