Sed de mal 토론

The ambitious, masterfully carried-out tracking shot aside, is there anything else about the film that warrants its reputation? Or am I overrating it?

6 댓글 (1 / 1)

Jump to last post

I've just watched, and I think it was utterly terrible. So many bad characters, bad performances, so many of the conversations felt so stilted. For the first half, it couldn't decide whether to be a thriller or a comedy. But hey, it's always a treat to see Marlene Dietrich. Don't know if I even want to see "Citizen Kane" at this point.

@CelluloidFan said:

The ambitious, masterfully carried-out tracking shot aside, is there anything else about the film that warrants its reputation? Or am I overrating it?

I'm not sure if I understand your question but I loved the suspense of the opening credits scene. Is a memorable scene.

@DonGable said:

I've just watched, and I think it was utterly terrible. So many bad characters, bad performances, so many of the conversations felt so stilted. For the first half, it couldn't decide whether to be a thriller or a comedy. But hey, it's always a treat to see Marlene Dietrich. Don't know if I even want to see "Citizen Kane" at this point.

Citizen Kane is waaaaay better to this film. Touch of evil is good, but is not a CLASSIC for me

@rominabe said:

@CelluloidFan said:

The ambitious, masterfully carried-out tracking shot aside, is there anything else about the film that warrants its reputation? Or am I overrating it?

I'm not sure if I understand your question but I loved the suspense of the opening credits scene. Is a memorable scene.

This is what I meant: Is there anything else about this film that makes it deserve its rep, other than the opening shot?

@BaronOfHair said:

@CelluloidFan said:

@rominabe said:

@CelluloidFan said:

The ambitious, masterfully carried-out tracking shot aside, is there anything else about the film that warrants its reputation? Or am I overrating it?

I'm not sure if I understand your question but I loved the suspense of the opening credits scene. Is a memorable scene.

This is what I meant: Is there anything else about this film that makes it deserve its rep, other than the opening shot?

Orson Welles is a director in the vein of Dario Argento and Micheal Mann, and I mean this as a compliment. The technical virtuosity of these directors is inevitably the star of all their movies. The actors are just along for the ride

I enjoyed Citizen Kane. I grasp what you mean in regard to Welles' Touch of Evil , as well. Perhaps the latter film's rep is rightly warranted.

I really love the Dennis Weaver creepy hotel owner scenes. That whole bit is one crazy exploitation-film vibe. Pre-Psycho too. But yeah it's not a classic. It's a very good film noir, but it's no where near the best. Heston is miscast -- and the brown face is just bad! Welles is having fun in his role -- playing even fatter and bloated than he actually was. All his scenes are very Welles -- especially all the actors talking over each other.

찾으시는 영화나 TV 프로그램이 없나요? 로그인 하셔서 직접 만들어주세요.

전체

s 검색 바 띄우기
p 프로필 메뉴 열기
esc 열린 창 닫기
? 키보드 단축키 창 열기

미디어 페이지

b 돌아가기
e 편집 페이지로 이동

TV 시즌 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 시즌으로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 시즌으로 가기

TV 에피소드 페이지

(우 화살표) 다음 에피소드로 가기
(좌 화살표) 이전 에피소드로 가기

모든 이미지 페이지

a 이미지 추가 창 열기

모든 편집 페이지

t 번역 선택 열기
ctrl+ s 항목 저장

토론 페이지

n 새 토론 만들기
w 보기 상태
p 공개/비공개 전환
c 열기/닫기 전환
a 활동 열기
r 댓글에 글쓰기
l 마지막 댓글로 가기
ctrl+ enter 회원님의 메세지 제출
(우 화살표) 다음 페이지
(좌 화살표) 이전 페이지

설정

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

로그인