Honestly, I barely remember his performance. He just brooded a bit. He is a good actor, but I don't think he had enough to do to justify a nomination considering some of the contenders this year.
oh come on .. it was amazing especially when you compare it to the comic book BS we get nowadays
Well that isn't much of a competition now is it? I wasn't planning on watching The Academy Awards this year anyway because very few films that are truly considered great were released this year.
I think the following nominations make sense, given the competition:
Best Cinematography: No brainer top 3 of the year
Best Movie: Best of the year's blockbusters; should give the dramas and prestige movies a run for their money
Best Directing
Best Editing: Yes, editing...
I don't know about the smaller awards... I don't think Dunkirk should be nominated for any of the acting... it's not that kind of film...
It'll be interesting to see what the competition is... especially on the cinematography and directing sides, which I think are the stronger sides of Dunkirk... Maybe editing as well, but that's a bit more controversial...
@GerardKennelly if I had to chose a performance it would probably be Mark Rylance, as he had the meatiest role, but even then it's pretty light... The characters are kept quite minimal in this movie...
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Reply by Purplehearts
on December 17, 2017 at 2:42 AM
Zero
Reply by GerardKennelly
on December 17, 2017 at 2:43 AM
@ april422
why ?
Reply by Purplehearts
on December 17, 2017 at 2:48 AM
Because there wasn't anything great about that movie.
Reply by GerardKennelly
on December 17, 2017 at 2:58 AM
@april422
oh come on .. it was amazing especially when you compare it to the comic book BS we get nowadays
Reply by rudely_murray
on December 17, 2017 at 3:31 AM
Production Design, Editing, Sound, Special Effects.
No denying the technical elements of the film, they were superb, although I wouldn't personally nominate it for cinematography.
Nothing for the cast - nobody really had the chance to shine.
Reply by GerardKennelly
on December 17, 2017 at 3:31 AM
@rudely_murray
cillian deserves a nom
Reply by rudely_murray
on December 17, 2017 at 3:33 AM
Honestly, I barely remember his performance. He just brooded a bit. He is a good actor, but I don't think he had enough to do to justify a nomination considering some of the contenders this year.
Reply by Purplehearts
on December 17, 2017 at 9:36 AM
Well that isn't much of a competition now is it? I wasn't planning on watching The Academy Awards this year anyway because very few films that are truly considered great were released this year.
Reply by Renovatio
on December 17, 2017 at 11:45 AM
I think the following nominations make sense, given the competition:
I don't know about the smaller awards... I don't think Dunkirk should be nominated for any of the acting... it's not that kind of film...
It'll be interesting to see what the competition is... especially on the cinematography and directing sides, which I think are the stronger sides of Dunkirk... Maybe editing as well, but that's a bit more controversial...
Reply by GerardKennelly
on December 17, 2017 at 10:59 PM
@Renovatio there must be at least one performance that deserves a nom iyo
Reply by Renovatio
on December 18, 2017 at 3:17 AM
@GerardKennelly if I had to chose a performance it would probably be Mark Rylance, as he had the meatiest role, but even then it's pretty light... The characters are kept quite minimal in this movie...