Discuss Heat

I originally gave this movie a 5/10. I assume that rating was from many years ago and a carry over from the imdb days. After seeing it again today I think I was probably a bit harsh first time around. It's a fun adventure and has some great actors, some of whom went downhill pretty fast after this. So maybe not guys at their peak, but not far from it.

There's a lot of stupid in this movie. The OTT shootout outside the bank, robbers putting on face masks in the middle of a robbery, a serial killer leaving his DNA inside the women he kills, LA cops not knowing who McCauley is even tho he's already done serious time AND leaves his DNA and fingerprints everywhere: you don't need to be a lawyer or a law enforcement officer to be shaking your head at some of this stuff. And the domestic lives of the principals is just dead air and sometimes boneheaded. Are we really to believe that a young woman falls for a middle aged man after ONE night, and he likewise- to the extent that they intend to start a new life in New Zealand together? It's incredible.

What works is the parallel lives of McCauley and Hanna. That's top notch stuff. If only it weren't muddled by a mess of stupid things and all the WAGS business. I upped my rating to 6. It's a better movie than I first thought and has aged well. I'm not a fan of remakes, but this probably has enough in it to be worth a shot, assuming actors of the caliber of De Niro and Pacino could be cast.

16 replies (on page 2 of 2)

Jump to last post

Previous page

@Jacinto Cupboard said:

@CelluloidFan

Simply making a claim that my argument is 'weak' is not itself an argument. It is conclusory, insulting and lazy. Your claim that film is a visual medium and is therefore under no obligation to tell a cohesive story, as tho Heat were an Ingmar Bergman film rather than a mainstream Hollywood blockbuster, is reaching. It is noteworthy that you make no attempt whatever to explain how the aspects I referred to are coherent.

It's a message board, not a debating arena. This fact seems utterly lost on you. You write here as though your professional reputation hinges on it. I come here to write and send messages. Furthermore, you betray your anger somewhat; It was Neo Losman's claim that film is a visual medium originally and not mine. I repeat: This is only a message board.

I have told you why aspects of this film don't work for me. That it works for you doesn't change that. If I said that I don't like Italian food and you chimed in saying that you adore it: that doesn't have the slightest relevance to what I have said.

As I stated before, you are entitled to your opinion, 'Cinto.

But thank you for allowing that I may have an opinion. How generous of you.

?

That said, I have lost patience with you and will now put you into ignore.

Oh, good. This is probably for the best. My message was posted for the entire board and viewing audience, not only for you. genplant would want things to run constructively and smoothly here, as far as exchanges are concerned. Muah.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login