Discuss King Arthur: Legend of the Sword
Discuss → Movies → King Arthur: Legend of the Sword → General
I was invited to an early screening, and passed
posted by tmdb13060682STAFFMOD on April 20, 2017 at 9:11 PM
I wouldn't watch this garbage if you bought me dinner, and gave me a shoulder massage in the theater.
Reply by Deuteronomy of Gath
on April 21, 2017 at 3:41 AM
Reading the overview I can't say I blame you. It sounds dire
Reply by Jason VoorDeez
on April 23, 2017 at 9:07 PM
I just saw the trailer and it looks soooooo bad. I wouldn't watch this if you paid for my ticket and did the hole in the popcorn trick.
Reply by Renovatio
on April 23, 2017 at 9:29 PM
looks ugly... very digital... boring trailer...
Is there a sequel in the works yet? Maybe a Netflix spinoff? ... haha
Reply by Renovatio
on April 24, 2017 at 8:28 AM
I only just realised that this is a guy richie film... wow... i guess it was downhill from sherlock onwards...
Reply by ScotWiZ
on April 27, 2017 at 5:35 PM
This film was horrible. Jax Teller strolling about fantasy London with his merry men. Just awful. I laughed at two points (which were meant to be funny). That's really all it had going for it. The casting throughout was a shambles. Some decent music. Guy Ritchie deserves a slap for this.
Reply by aholejones
on June 30, 2017 at 4:50 AM
Well, of the two big "blockbuster" films I've seen lately this one is definitely better than "The Mummy" if that can be called an endorsement. I have to wonder, though, how they managed to spend 175 million on this film. The special effects seem to focus on the sword fights, but I don't think they're that numerous and wouldn't imagine they could rack up the bill so much....Also I have to wonder how on earth did they think it was a good idea to give Guy Ritchie a 175 million production budget.
Reply by NotoriousRio
on June 30, 2017 at 7:37 AM
I saw ten minutes of this tripe but couldnt take any more, its that bad, well done Guy you made a King Arthur movie worse than First Knight!