Discuss Henry Cavill

Past, present, and future. Good, bad, disappointing, or overrated. Feel free to talk about series, tv films, and shows too.

The IMDB list of upcoming releases for United States.

267 replies (on page 1 of 18)

Jump to last post

Next pageLast page

In my opinion, Thor: Ragnarock is 2017s most overrated comic book movie. A 92% on rotten tomatoes is just insane. A few critics agree with me.

With its 130 minute script that has no clue where it's going, mixed with a mash-fest of 1980's fantasy/sci-fi films we've already seen, it is an intumescent mega mess.

Thor Ragnarok takes you on a visually psychedelic adventure that sadly goes absolutely nowhere.

This film is mediocre as a comedy, as a drama it's worse.

Battles should have heart, danger, and consequences. The conflicts in Thor: Ragnarok are lacking in all three.

When I think overrated, I think Thor, Wonder Woman, and Star Wars.

I’m really disappointed in WW. Is it really a film made by women? All 5 writers were men and 8 of the 10 producers were men. I don’t see anything new or strong about the story or the character. It was made by men to please men.

Black Panther trailer

I didn't know there is a Bumblebee spin off. I never thought a Transformer would bomb, but the last one did.

@HCFan said:

When I think overrated, I think Thor, Wonder Woman, and Star Wars.

I’m really disappointed in WW. Is it really a film made by women? All 5 writers were men and 8 of the 10 producers were men. I don’t see anything new or strong about the story or the character. It was made by men to please men.

I agree with you and James Cameron. Patty Jenkins is too stupid to understand.

@HCFan said:

It was made by men to please men.

The men didn't forget you womenfolk. They included a Chris Pine shower scene for you. :laughing:

I'm curious about the Joker film. It won't be part of the DCEU and Leonardo Dicaprio is said to play him. Is he a good choice? Leo doesn't look psychotic. :thinking:

@Blue-Rose said:

I'm curious about the Joker film. It won't be part of the DCEU and Leonardo Dicaprio is said to play him. Is he a good choice? Leo doesn't look psychotic. :thinking:

Leo will be fine. I’m more concerned about this whole new direction that WB may take now that JL failed.

Now, however, Warners wants to branch off with stand-alone movies that are unconnected to that version of the DC world. The new movies will have non-traditional takes on the heroes and villains of DC, and hopefully, attract actors and filmmakers who don’t typically toil in the comic-book movie world. War for the Planet of the Apes director Matt Reeves is developing a Batman stand-alone that, according to sources, will not star Ben Affleck, who plays the caped crusader in the DC Universe movies (Warners and Affleck have denied he is being replaced). The plan is to launch a separate label for these projects to distinguish them from the rest of the DC films. (Warners executives are acutely aware of the risks of audience confusion.)

http://hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/leonardo-dicaprio-joker-movie-warner-bros-wants-actor-role-1034392

To avoid confusion WB might quit the embarrassing DCEU.

@Jim666 said:

Now, however, Warners wants to branch off with stand-alone movies that are unconnected to that version of the DC world. The new movies will have non-traditional takes on the heroes and villains of DC, and hopefully, attract actors and filmmakers who don’t typically toil in the comic-book movie world. War for the Planet of the Apes director Matt Reeves is developing a Batman stand-alone that, according to sources, will not star Ben Affleck, who plays the caped crusader in the DC Universe movies (Warners and Affleck have denied he is being replaced). The plan is to launch a separate label for these projects to distinguish them from the rest of the DC films. (Warners executives are acutely aware of the risks of audience confusion.)

http://hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/leonardo-dicaprio-joker-movie-warner-bros-wants-actor-role-1034392

To avoid confusion WB might quit the embarrassing DCEU.

:thumbsup_tone1: :thumbsup_tone1: :thumbsup_tone1: :thumbsup_tone1:

The thumbs up are much better than what I wrote before.

Just one more Superman film with Henry Cavill and they can pull the plug on DCEU.

Does any of you have good news?

@Blue-Rose said:

Does any of you have good news?

What is good news? Is it good news that Henry Cavill, Ben Afleck and Gal Gadot still have JL2 on their IMDB page? Cyborg and Wonder Woman will be in Flashpoint and Ben’s Batman film is in pre-production.

@Jim666 said:

@Blue-Rose said:

Does any of you have good news?

What is good news? Is it good news that Henry Cavill, Ben Afleck and Gal Gadot still have JL2 on their IMDB page? Cyborg and Wonder Woman will be in Flashpoint and Ben’s Batman film is in pre-production.

IMDB doesn't update shyt.

@HCFan said:

When I think overrated, I think Thor, Wonder Woman, and Star Wars.

I’m really disappointed in WW. Is it really a film made by women? All 5 writers were men and 8 of the 10 producers were men. I don’t see anything new or strong about the story or the character. It was made by men to please men.

Not this again. So many overate films, but WW always gets the most hate. The superhero genre is dominated by men. A female director is a huge step. A critically and financially successful superheroine film is a huge accomplishment. So who cares if men wrote it and produced it? They gave her a decent story, something they failed to give the male dominated BvS and JL.

@Cashmere said:

@HCFan said:

When I think overrated, I think Thor, Wonder Woman, and Star Wars.

I’m really disappointed in WW. Is it really a film made by women? All 5 writers were men and 8 of the 10 producers were men. I don’t see anything new or strong about the story or the character. It was made by men to please men.

I agree with you and James Cameron. Patty Jenkins is too stupid to understand.

James Douchebag Cameron should shut his pie hole. The SM suit leaves very little to the imagination. HC is in the film to be ogled because he barely speaks. LOL And men wrote, direct and produced MOS, BvS and JL, but they let SM have a few shirtless scenes in all those films. I only hear guys complain about those shirtless scenes. LOL

@Jim666 said:

@Blue-Rose said:

Does any of you have good news?

What is good news? Is it good news that Henry Cavill, Ben Afleck and Gal Gadot still have JL2 on their IMDB page? Cyborg and Wonder Woman will be in Flashpoint and Ben’s Batman film is in pre-production.

What is good news? Certainly not what you wrote.

@AnnaB said:

@Cashmere said:

@HCFan said:

When I think overrated, I think Thor, Wonder Woman, and Star Wars.

I’m really disappointed in WW. Is it really a film made by women? All 5 writers were men and 8 of the 10 producers were men. I don’t see anything new or strong about the story or the character. It was made by men to please men.

I agree with you and James Cameron. Patty Jenkins is too stupid to understand.

James Douchebag Cameron should shut his pie hole. The SM suit leaves very little to the imagination. HC is in the film to be ogled because he barely speaks. LOL And men wrote, direct and produced MOS, BvS and JL, but they let SM have a few shirtless scenes in all those films. I only hear guys complain about those shirtless scenes. LOL

JC does have a point. GG doesn't have boobs, a bootie or an hourglass figure, but WW miraculously does. Her appearance is altered to appeal to men and she’s okay with it. Her daughter must ask her why she must change her appearance to play WW.

https://us.hellomagazine.com/entertainment/12016031612791/wonder-woman-gal-gadot-daughter-superheroes-role-models

WW is beauty, brains, strength, power. Women don’t need boobs, bootie or an hourglass figure to be considered a woman, smart, strong, beautiful or powerful. Sorry that’s not what WW teaches women. What WW teaches is the opposite. Unfortunately CGI can’t alter any body part in the real world. So buy yourself a corset, padded bra and padded panties or pay the nearest plastic surgeon a visit.

@Cashmere said:

JC does have a point. GG doesn't have boobs, a bootie or an hourglass figure, but WW miraculously does. Her appearance is altered to appeal to men and she’s okay with it. Her daughter must ask her why she must change her appearance to play WW.

https://us.hellomagazine.com/entertainment/12016031612791/wonder-woman-gal-gadot-daughter-superheroes-role-models

WW is beauty, brains, strength, power. Women don’t need boobs, bootie or an hourglass figure to be considered a woman, smart, strong, beautiful or powerful. Sorry that’s not what WW teaches women. What WW teaches is the opposite. Unfortunately CGI can’t alter any body part in the real world. So buy yourself a corset, padded bra and padded panties or pay the nearest plastic surgeon a visit.

This is why women can’t have nice things. LOL HC altered his appearance too. WW has the boobs, bootie and hourglass many women want. SM has the abs, arms and v-shaped back many men want. CGI, corset and padding are wrong. Overworking your heart in the gym and drinking a barrel of protein are fine.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page