Please reopen and reconsider. I agree with the OP: the title should be Possessor.
In the movie itself, both title cards (opening and closing credits) show POSSESSOR. The production company site shows the title as Possessor. The official website is gone (parked) but the Japanese site is still up. All the social media sites for the film are named possessormovie.
If some distributor added uncut for its release it was probably to differentiate it from possibly censored releases elsewhere.
(Aren’t censored/uncut releases treated the same as director’s cuts, extended cuts, television cuts, etc., and meant to be ignored, per the Contribution Bible?)
Reply by Rebecca
on October 23, 2020 at 6:59 PM
Looking at the official website, I can see "Possessor Uncut" is used in multiple places.
Reply by Renoir
on January 26, 2022 at 2:07 AM
Please reopen and reconsider. I agree with the OP: the title should be Possessor.
In the movie itself, both title cards (opening and closing credits) show POSSESSOR. The production company site shows the title as Possessor. The official website is gone (parked) but the Japanese site is still up. All the social media sites for the film are named possessormovie.
If some distributor added uncut for its release it was probably to differentiate it from possibly censored releases elsewhere.
(Aren’t censored/uncut releases treated the same as director’s cuts, extended cuts, television cuts, etc., and meant to be ignored, per the Contribution Bible?)