Discuss The Hunt for Red October

It's always bothered me that this new Russian Stealth sub that supposedly had the capability to sneak up on the US coastline loaded with nuclear missiles, was easily detected by the sonar man on the Dallas.

Whales humping & farting? Really? Seismic anomaly? Seems like a pretty big flaw in the submarine design. And if it is that easily trackable, the whole premise of defection is unnecessary.

1 reply (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

It wasn't "easily" detectable. Anything that moves has a sonic signature, but the Caterpillar Drive would have been very difficult to detect compared to a standard prop driven sub. Remember that the sonic signature was almost unreadable until a large segment of it was recorded, then played back at 10X speed (which suggested a man made pattern of sound), something that can't be done in real time.

If you know it's there, you can bang it with active sonar which will identify not only the sub but also the sub that's sending the sonar.

Even stealth aircraft can be detected, IF one knows the general location of the craft to start with. The Dallas had trouble tracking the Red October even though it had a good idea where it was.


s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page